New Game

When I speak in new game, a different game for the capitalism, many people find inside that it would be a new regimen, of the classification:

Capitalist regimen
Communist regimen
Socialist regimen
Etc...

It is not necessary a new system to change the world, to bring peace to the world, so that we Men let us start to be, the great glory of the Universe.

It is..... because......... for the time being..... the Man is the great disaster of the Universe.

While we will have hunger, while the Man kill itself and to other species, to destroy the environment in the Earth, we will continue to be the garbage of the Universe.

That joke with MSN checkers game, in reality, is not a joke, is the most accurate test of the capacity that the Man has.

The capacity in establishing what it is good and what is bad for each individual.

Many times what it is good for one are not for the other.

The checkers game of the MSN that I speak, for that does not follow the nonsense that I write, is the Suicide Game.

Who gains the game, is that obtain to lose.

It is totally different of the normal one, that, who gains the game, is who obtains to earn.

It is the same game, you move the parts in a similar way, it makes queens, etc, but, you have to make efforts to lose, you can not earn, because is losing that you earn.

What it is good and what something is bad is very relative, many times what it is good at a time, in other passes to be faced as ridicule.

If the people who adopt the Muslim religion find that to use the veil or clothes of determined form, hiding the body, are because inside of the context of them, is this that goes to help them to have a good life.

That is, for them, this made right procedure.

The people who use summarys biquini in Ipanema beaches, are because inside of the context of them, it is this that goes to help them to have a good life.

That is, for them, this made right procedure.

Then we have an opposing diversity of procedures, what it is certain for one is made a mistake for the other.

In this reality the worse error is to want to determine who is missed in this situation.

Because both, are subjective situations, adopted conventions, or in modern language, virtual.

It is to want to establish which version of the checkers game of the MSN is the correct one.

When I discovered this game I gave account of the largeness of the human mind.

As it can manipulate the feelings of the people.

While in the normal game you satisfies with the victory, in the new game you satisfies with the defeat.

While one wants to walk covered another one wants to walk bare.

For me this capacity of the brain is wonderful, because from there, we see that everything is conventions.

That in the reality the man is imprisoned inside of its conventions, and many times, devoured for them.

And when we are devoured by them?

When ours conventions bring bad feelings to the others, or intervene with the conventions of the others.

What is the solution for the management of the conflict of established conventions.

The agreement has inside of being made a bigger convention, the first one of the conventions.

To love the next one, as you love proper itself, because in the reality, we are equal in the essence. What we differs are our conventions.

As the Nash already had affirmed, something is only good when it takes care of to all the involved ones.

By the way, already we hear this conclusion of others, I am not that saying this, I only, thanks to a game I glimpsed this fact, I obtained to have the agreement of this principle, that many already had obtained to understand.

In this point of view it does not interest the regimen.

If the regimen to come of meeting to all, or either to take care of the necessities of all, it will be a good regimen.

The regimen depends on who is applying it.

Therefore the communist regimen did not give certain. The communist regimen in essence would aim the man, while the capitalism aims at to the attainment of the money and of that it can bring independent of are happening with the other of who is catching the money, is less humanitarian.

Then why the communism gave wrong?

Because the man is not ready to love the next one. Not evolve the sufficient.

The capitalism is more intrinsically inserted on the current human period of evolution, still very instinctive, and would say until, irrational.

I am calling the actual man, primitive, irrational?

I am.


To apply the capitalism wildly, is to forget the next one, and when forgetting the next one, it goes to react.

Interesting this: if we forget all, all forget us.

And there, it is where comes the violence.

It is the instinct of the equality.

The man finds that it is equal to the others, has the same right of the others. If one can, also, I have to can.

It does not advance to have conventions (laws) that hinder this.

A case that I taste to cite is the robbery of tennis of our children, for boys who do not obtain to have an equal one.

The propaganda infuses conventions.

”It is Nike, the tennis of the Ronaldinho, if you want to have something in common with Ronaldinho, your idol, you has that to have the Nike tennis “

The propaganda generates conventions that the society finishes accepting, the problem is that they are accepted by rich and poor persons too.

As the poor person cannot buy, it uses the violence and steals the tennis of our son.

It is the instinct of the equality.

The biggest problem is that it is not enough to use the tennis to be as Ronaldinho.

It is a false convention, without ethics. The manufacturer gives to its product a quality that it does not have.

But all accept.

Rich and poor.

Despite to be virtual.

The image of Ronaldinho was bought to give to the tennis a quality that it does not have.

The tennis is made of cloth and rubber, has good quality, but it does not transform nobody into Ronaldinho.

He is expensive, a small parcel of the population can buy.

If the manufacturer loves the next one, he would be sensitized for poor, he would not establish conventions that could sensitize in such a way a poor child who took it to commit the robbery, or would not charge in such a way the tennis.

Some, call this situation, ethics in the propaganda.

I call this. lack of care in the attitudes. Lack of love to the next one.

Many are come across with similar cases to this.

It is not necessary to change the regimen, the game yes.

We go to play the capitalist regimen in view of loving the next one.

This is enough.

She is not necessary laws, nor nothing more, the only thing that we need is in acquiring knowledge that we have to play in another way.

If laws decided, Brazil would be wonderful, therefore it has law for everything.

Only that as the people say here in Brazil, the law does not catch.

Law does not advance.

The concern nowadays, is not to follow the law, is to find a form of not accomplish it, of preference even in a legal way, what many times, with the amount of laws, it is possible.


We need always going acquiring knowledge, that we can establish new conventions for the game, having in sight, loving the next one.

It is not necessary have laws for this, is enough to acquire yourself knowledge of this, all to acquire knowledge of this.

Therefore, I always speak that everything depends on us.

This care is enough.

It would be a new period of human evolution , a new step in the human evolution , perhaps the main one.

It is this that many had tried in saying to us and that I, favours to the MSN, I obtained to see.